head to head · open source

seaweedfs vs hue

seaweedfs has 34,819 GitHub stars, 3,002 forks, 772 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hue has 1,411 stars, 412 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped yesterday. seaweedfs leads on adoption by 2,368% (34,819 vs 1,411 stars). seaweedfs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; hue is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. seaweedfs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, hue 29%. seaweedfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

seaweedfs ★ 35K hue ★ 1.4K category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

seaweedfs hue
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 1.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 412
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick seaweedfs if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full seaweedfs profile →

pick hue if

  • You want the hue feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and hue fits your workflow better

full hue profile →

About seaweedfs

SeaweedFS is an Apache 2.0 distributed storage system written in Go that serves an S3 compatible object store, a POSIX file system, and Iceberg lakehouse tables from one weed binary, built for storing and serving billions of files with O(1) disk access.

read the full seaweedfs overview →

About hue

Hue is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed SQL Assistant service for databases and data warehouses, built for data analysts, data engineers, and platform teams that need a shared, browser based way to query and explore data instead of installing a separate client for every engine.

read the full hue overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

seaweedfs vs ClickHouse seaweedfs vs rustfs seaweedfs vs parse-server seaweedfs vs Apache Pinot seaweedfs vs dlt seaweedfs vs bigquery-utils seaweedfs vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is seaweedfs or hue more popular?

seaweedfs has 34,819 GitHub stars and hue has 1,411. seaweedfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are seaweedfs and hue free?

Both are open source. seaweedfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and hue under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between seaweedfs and hue?

seaweedfs is written in Go and hue in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, seaweedfs or hue?

Choose seaweedfs if you want the larger community (34,819 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose hue if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.