head to head · open source

seaweedfs vs lakeFS

seaweedfs has 34,859 GitHub stars, 3,004 forks, 772 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lakeFS has 5,535 stars, 477 forks, 443 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. seaweedfs leads on adoption by 530% (34,859 vs 5,535 stars). seaweedfs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; lakeFS is written in Go under Apache-2.0. seaweedfs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, lakeFS 9%. seaweedfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

seaweedfs ★ 35K lakeFS ★ 5.5K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

seaweedfs lakeFS
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 5.5K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 477
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick seaweedfs if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full seaweedfs profile →

pick lakeFS if

  • You want the lakeFS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and lakeFS fits your workflow better

full lakeFS profile →

About seaweedfs

SeaweedFS is an Apache 2.0 distributed storage system written in Go that serves an S3 compatible object store, a POSIX file system, and Iceberg lakehouse tables from one weed binary, built for storing and serving billions of files with O(1) disk access.

read the full seaweedfs overview →

About lakeFS

lakeFS is an open source data version control tool — commonly described as Git for data — that turns object storage into a versioned, Git like repository, and it is built for data engineers, analytics engineers, and data scientists who need repeatable, atomic, and auditable data lake operations.

read the full lakeFS overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 83K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

seaweedfs vs ClickHouse seaweedfs vs rustfs seaweedfs vs parse-server seaweedfs vs Apache Pinot seaweedfs vs dlt seaweedfs vs mountpoint-s3 seaweedfs vs cubefs seaweedfs vs hue seaweedfs vs bigquery-utils seaweedfs vs bigfunctions seaweedfs vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is seaweedfs or lakeFS more popular?

seaweedfs has 34,859 GitHub stars and lakeFS has 5,535. seaweedfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are seaweedfs and lakeFS free?

Both are open source. seaweedfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lakeFS under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between seaweedfs and lakeFS?

seaweedfs is written in Go and lakeFS in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, seaweedfs or lakeFS?

Choose seaweedfs if you want the larger community (34,859 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lakeFS if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.