head to head · open source

rustfs vs versitygw

rustfs has 35,662 GitHub stars, 1,641 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. versitygw has 3,087 stars, 330 forks, 154 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rustfs leads on adoption by 1,055% (35,662 vs 3,087 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; versitygw is written in Go under Apache-2.0. rustfs has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, versitygw 11%. versitygw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (filesystem, object-storage, s3), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rustfs ★ 36K versitygw ★ 3.1K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rustfs versitygw
GitHub stars ★ 36K ★ 3.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 330
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rustfs if

  • You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rustfs profile →

pick versitygw if

  • You want the versitygw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and versitygw fits your workflow better

full versitygw profile →

About rustfs

RustFS is a high performance, distributed object storage system built in Rust. Getting Started · Docs · Bug reports · Discussions English 简体中文 Deutsch Español français 日本語 한국어 Portuguese Русский RustFS is a high performance, distributed object storage system built in Rust—one of the most loved programming languages worldwide. RustFS combines the simplicity of MinIO with the memory safety and raw performance of Rust. It offers broad S3 API compatibility for supported features, is completely open source, and is optimized for data lakes, AI, and big data workloads. Unlike other storage systems, RustFS is released…

read the full rustfs overview →

About versitygw

The Versity S3 Gateway: A High Performance S3 Translation Service Binary release builds Download latest release Use Cases Turn your local filesystem into an S3 server with a single command! Proxy S3 requests to S3 storage Simple to deploy S3 server with a single command Protocol compatibility in posix allows common access to files via posix or S3 Simplified interface for adding new storage system support WebGUI Get more details about the new (optional) WebGUI management/explorer here: S3 RDMA VersityGW supports S3 over RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access), enabling high throughput, low latency object transfers…

read the full versitygw overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

Frequently asked questions

Is rustfs or versitygw more popular?

rustfs has 35,662 GitHub stars and versitygw has 3,087. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are rustfs and versitygw free?

Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and versitygw under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rustfs and versitygw?

rustfs is written in Rust and versitygw in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rustfs or versitygw?

Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (35,662 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose versitygw if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.