head to head · open source

valkey vs juicefs

valkey has 27,258 GitHub stars, 1,318 forks, 894 open issues and last shipped today. juicefs has 14,440 stars, 1,290 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped today. valkey leads on adoption by 89% (27,258 vs 14,440 stars). valkey is written in C under BSD-3-Clause; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. valkey has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. valkey was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (redis), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

valkey ★ 27K juicefs ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

valkey juicefs
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 14K
License BSD-3-Clause Apache-2.0
Written in C Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick valkey if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full valkey profile →

pick juicefs if

  • You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better

full juicefs profile →

About valkey

Valkey is high performance data structure server. Serves key/value workloads first. Supports wide range of native structures plus extensible plugin system for new data structures and access patterns. Written in C, licensed BSD 3 Clause. Lives in key value store and NoSQL ecosystem, shares protocol lineage with Redis, and carries cache , database , key value store , redis , valkey client topics.

read the full valkey overview →

About juicefs

JuiceFS is a Go based, Apache 2.0 distributed POSIX file system that stores file data in object storage and metadata in a database engine such as Redis, MySQL, SQLite, or TiKV, and it is aimed at cloud native infrastructure, big data, machine learning, and AI workloads.

read the full juicefs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

valkey vs mall valkey vs Prometheus valkey vs NocoDB valkey vs etcd valkey vs DBeaver valkey vs orm valkey vs Milvus valkey vs TiDB valkey vs drawDB valkey vs typeorm valkey vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager valkey vs Qdrant

Frequently asked questions

Is valkey or juicefs more popular?

valkey has 27,258 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,440. valkey has the larger community by that measure.

Are valkey and juicefs free?

Both are open source. valkey is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between valkey and juicefs?

valkey is written in C and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, valkey or juicefs?

Choose valkey if you want the larger community (27,258 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.