head to head · open source

uppy vs cyberduck

uppy has 30,989 GitHub stars, 2,103 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cyberduck has 4,788 stars, 369 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped yesterday. uppy leads on adoption by 547% (30,989 vs 4,788 stars). uppy is written in TypeScript under MIT; cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0. uppy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, cyberduck 8%. uppy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dropbox), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

uppy ★ 31K cyberduck ★ 4.8K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

uppy cyberduck
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 4.8K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 369
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick uppy if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full uppy profile →

pick cyberduck if

  • You want the cyberduck feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and cyberduck fits your workflow better

full cyberduck profile →

About uppy

Uppy is an MIT licensed, TypeScript built, modular JavaScript file uploader for web browsers that drops into any web application, aimed at developers who would rather wire up plugins than build file uploading from scratch.

read the full uppy overview →

About cyberduck

Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for macOS and Windows, released under the GNU General Public License version 3 and developed at the iterate ch/cyberduck repository.

read the full cyberduck overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs uppy localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

uppy vs LocalSend uppy vs rclone uppy vs copyparty uppy vs Files uppy vs yazi uppy vs Spacedrive uppy vs Nextcloud uppy vs cloudreve uppy vs superfile uppy vs ranger uppy vs Seafile uppy vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is uppy or cyberduck more popular?

uppy has 30,989 GitHub stars and cyberduck has 4,788. uppy has the larger community by that measure.

Are uppy and cyberduck free?

Both are open source. uppy is licensed under MIT and cyberduck under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between uppy and cyberduck?

uppy is written in TypeScript and cyberduck in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, uppy or cyberduck?

Choose uppy if you want the larger community (30,989 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cyberduck if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.