head to head · open source

uppy vs Seafile

uppy has 30,989 GitHub stars, 2,103 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Seafile has 15,257 stars, 1,677 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. uppy leads on adoption by 103% (30,989 vs 15,257 stars). uppy is written in TypeScript under MIT; Seafile is written in C under a custom or non-standard licence. uppy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Seafile 11%. uppy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

uppy ★ 31K Seafile ★ 15K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

uppy Seafile
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 15K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick uppy if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full uppy profile →

pick Seafile if

  • You want the Seafile feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and Seafile fits your workflow better

full Seafile profile →

About uppy

Uppy is an MIT licensed, TypeScript built, modular JavaScript file uploader for web browsers that drops into any web application, aimed at developers who would rather wire up plugins than build file uploading from scratch.

read the full uppy overview →

About Seafile

Seafile is an open source cloud storage system written in C and positioned as a self hosted alternative to Dropbox and Google Drive. It organizes files into libraries, each of which can be synced separately, encrypted with a user chosen password, and shared between users or groups. The project lives in the self hosted file sync and document management ecosystem, where it combines storage, collaboration, knowledge management, and metadata features.

read the full Seafile overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs uppy localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

uppy vs LocalSend uppy vs rclone uppy vs copyparty uppy vs Files uppy vs yazi uppy vs Spacedrive uppy vs Nextcloud uppy vs cloudreve uppy vs superfile uppy vs ranger uppy vs PairDrop uppy vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is uppy or Seafile more popular?

uppy has 30,989 GitHub stars and Seafile has 15,257. uppy has the larger community by that measure.

Are uppy and Seafile free?

Both are open source. uppy is licensed under MIT, and Seafile has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between uppy and Seafile?

uppy is written in TypeScript and Seafile in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, uppy or Seafile?

Choose uppy if you want the larger community (30,989 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Seafile if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.