head to head · open source

SearXNG vs Typesense

SearXNG has 37,253 GitHub stars, 3,396 forks, 215 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Typesense has 26,568 stars, 974 forks, 879 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. SearXNG leads on adoption by 40% (37,253 vs 26,568 stars). SearXNG is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; Typesense is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. SearXNG has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Typesense 4%. SearXNG was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

SearXNG ★ 37K Typesense ★ 27K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

SearXNG Typesense
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 27K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Python C++
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 3.4K ⑂ 974
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick SearXNG if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full SearXNG profile →

pick Typesense if

  • You want the Typesense feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Typesense fits your workflow better

full Typesense profile →

About SearXNG

SearXNG is a free, self hostable metasearch engine that aggregates results from more than 270 search services and databases, and it is meant for people and organizations that want web search without being tracked or profiled.

read the full SearXNG overview →

About Typesense

Typesense is an open source, C++ built search engine released under the GPL 3.0 licence that provides typo tolerant, low latency full text search for developers and teams who want an Algolia alternative they host and control themselves.

read the full Typesense overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

elasticsearch vs searxng elasticsearch vs typesense meilisearch vs searxng meilisearch vs typesense elasticsearch vs meilisearch elasticsearch vs opensearch elasticsearch vs manticore elasticsearch vs quickwit uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Search Engines projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Search Engines field.

SearXNG vs Elasticsearch SearXNG vs Meilisearch SearXNG vs OpenSearch SearXNG vs Manticore Search SearXNG vs Quickwit SearXNG vs SeekStorm

Frequently asked questions

Is SearXNG or Typesense more popular?

SearXNG has 37,253 GitHub stars and Typesense has 26,568. SearXNG has the larger community by that measure.

Are SearXNG and Typesense free?

Both are open source. SearXNG is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Typesense under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between SearXNG and Typesense?

SearXNG is written in Python and Typesense in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, SearXNG or Typesense?

Choose SearXNG if you want the larger community (37,253 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Typesense if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.