head to head · open source

SearXNG vs SeekStorm

SearXNG has 37,253 GitHub stars, 3,396 forks, 215 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SeekStorm has 1,911 stars, 69 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. SearXNG leads on adoption by 1,849% (37,253 vs 1,911 stars). SearXNG is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; SeekStorm is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. SearXNG has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, SeekStorm 4%. SearXNG was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (search), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

SearXNG ★ 37K SeekStorm ★ 1.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

SearXNG SeekStorm
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 1.9K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 3.4K ⑂ 69
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick SearXNG if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full SearXNG profile →

pick SeekStorm if

  • You want the SeekStorm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and SeekStorm fits your workflow better

full SeekStorm profile →

About SearXNG

SearXNG is a free, self hostable metasearch engine that aggregates results from more than 270 search services and databases, and it is meant for people and organizations that want web search without being tracked or profiled.

read the full SearXNG overview →

About SeekStorm

SeekStorm is Rust search project. It gives full text search API with real time indexing and crawling. It gives native vector and lexical search. It ships as in process library and multi tenancy server. It lives in Rust infrastructure and search engine ecosystem. It connects with crates.io, Docker, REST clients, and InstantSearch.js. License is Apache 2.0. GitHub shows 1910 stars and 69 forks. Category is Infrastructure and Operations and Search Engines.

read the full SeekStorm overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

elasticsearch vs searxng meilisearch vs searxng elasticsearch vs meilisearch elasticsearch vs typesense elasticsearch vs opensearch elasticsearch vs manticore elasticsearch vs quickwit meilisearch vs typesense uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Search Engines projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Search Engines field.

SearXNG vs Elasticsearch SearXNG vs Meilisearch SearXNG vs Typesense SearXNG vs OpenSearch SearXNG vs Manticore Search SearXNG vs Quickwit

Frequently asked questions

Is SearXNG or SeekStorm more popular?

SearXNG has 37,253 GitHub stars and SeekStorm has 1,911. SearXNG has the larger community by that measure.

Are SearXNG and SeekStorm free?

Both are open source. SearXNG is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeekStorm under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between SearXNG and SeekStorm?

SearXNG is written in Python and SeekStorm in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, SearXNG or SeekStorm?

Choose SearXNG if you want the larger community (37,253 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose SeekStorm if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.