head to head · open source

Typesense vs OpenSearch

Typesense has 26,568 GitHub stars, 974 forks, 879 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. OpenSearch has 13,726 stars, 2,958 forks, 3,167 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Typesense leads on adoption by 94% (26,568 vs 13,726 stars). Typesense is written in C++ under GPL-3.0; OpenSearch is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Typesense has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, OpenSearch 22%. OpenSearch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Typesense ★ 27K OpenSearch ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Typesense OpenSearch
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 14K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Java
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 974 ⑂ 3.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Typesense if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Typesense profile →

pick OpenSearch if

  • You want the OpenSearch feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and OpenSearch fits your workflow better

full OpenSearch profile →

About Typesense

Typesense is an open source, C++ built search engine released under the GPL 3.0 licence that provides typo tolerant, low latency full text search for developers and teams who want an Algolia alternative they host and control themselves.

read the full Typesense overview →

About OpenSearch

OpenSearch is an open source, distributed, and RESTful search engine, described in its README as an enterprise grade search and observability suite. It lives in the open source search and analytics ecosystem, is written in Java, and is licensed under Apache 2.0. The project states that it includes certain Apache licensed Elasticsearch code from Elasticsearch B.V., and that OpenSearch is a registered trademark of LF Projects, LLC.

read the full OpenSearch overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

elasticsearch vs typesense elasticsearch vs opensearch meilisearch vs typesense elasticsearch vs meilisearch elasticsearch vs searxng meilisearch vs searxng elasticsearch vs manticore elasticsearch vs quickwit uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Search Engines projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Search Engines field.

Typesense vs Elasticsearch Typesense vs Meilisearch Typesense vs SearXNG Typesense vs Manticore Search Typesense vs Quickwit Typesense vs SeekStorm

Frequently asked questions

Is Typesense or OpenSearch more popular?

Typesense has 26,568 GitHub stars and OpenSearch has 13,726. Typesense has the larger community by that measure.

Are Typesense and OpenSearch free?

Both are open source. Typesense is licensed under GPL-3.0 and OpenSearch under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Typesense and OpenSearch?

Typesense is written in C++ and OpenSearch in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Typesense or OpenSearch?

Choose Typesense if you want the larger community (26,568 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose OpenSearch if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.