head to head · open source

Turso vs Apache Druid

Turso has 17,215 GitHub stars, 530 forks, 453 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Apache Druid has 14,054 stars, 3,789 forks, 784 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Turso leads on adoption by 22% (17,215 vs 14,054 stars). Turso is written in C under MIT; Apache Druid is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Turso has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, Apache Druid 27%. Apache Druid was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Turso ★ 17K Apache Druid ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Turso Apache Druid
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 14K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C Java
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 530 ⑂ 3.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Turso if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Turso profile →

pick Apache Druid if

  • You want the Apache Druid feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Apache Druid fits your workflow better

full Apache Druid profile →

About Turso

libSQL is an open source, open contribution fork of SQLite created and maintained by Turso. It lives in the SQLite ecosystem and extends the embedded database model with features such as embedded replicas and remote access. The repository also distinguishes libSQL from the separate Turso database, which is a SQLite compatible implementation written from scratch in Rust and currently in beta.

read the full Turso overview →

About Apache Druid

Apache Druid is a high performance, open source real time analytics database written in Java and licensed under Apache 2.0, built for teams that need sub second OLAP queries and fast ingest for UIs, operational queries, and high concurrency workloads.

read the full Apache Druid overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Turso vs mall Turso vs Prometheus Turso vs NocoDB Turso vs etcd Turso vs DBeaver Turso vs orm Turso vs Milvus Turso vs TiDB Turso vs drawDB Turso vs typeorm Turso vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager Turso vs Qdrant

Frequently asked questions

Is Turso or Apache Druid more popular?

Turso has 17,215 GitHub stars and Apache Druid has 14,054. Turso has the larger community by that measure.

Are Turso and Apache Druid free?

Both are open source. Turso is licensed under MIT and Apache Druid under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Turso and Apache Druid?

Turso is written in C and Apache Druid in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Turso or Apache Druid?

Choose Turso if you want the larger community (17,215 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Apache Druid if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.