head to head · open source

trivy vs webhook

trivy has 37,961 GitHub stars, 691 forks, 269 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webhook has 12,134 stars, 875 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. trivy leads on adoption by 213% (37,961 vs 12,134 stars). trivy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; webhook is written in Go under MIT. trivy has attracted 2% as many forks as stars, webhook 7%. trivy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (go, hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

trivy ★ 38K webhook ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

trivy webhook
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-04
Forks ⑂ 691 ⑂ 875
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick trivy if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full trivy profile →

pick webhook if

  • You want the webhook feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and webhook fits your workflow better

full webhook profile →

About trivy

Trivy is an open source security scanner written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It is an Aqua Security open source project, hosted at trivy.dev, and it lives in the cloud native and DevSecOps ecosystem alongside container runtimes, Kubernetes clusters, and infrastructure as code tooling. The design separates two ideas: scanners, which describe the classes of security issue Trivy looks for, and targets, which describe where it looks. The README presents the project as a comprehensive and versatile scanner, and the topic list — containers, devsecops, docker, iac, infrastructure as code, kubernetes…

read the full trivy overview →

About webhook

webhook is a lightweight, MIT licensed incoming webhook server written in Go that exposes HTTP endpoints which execute configured shell commands, built for developers and operators who want a push from GitHub, Bitbucket, Slack, or Mattermost to run a deploy or maintenance script on their own server.

read the full webhook overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy trivy vs opentofu kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

trivy vs kong trivy vs OpenTofu trivy vs jenkins trivy vs Pulumi trivy vs floci trivy vs argo-cd trivy vs sops trivy vs wtf trivy vs dagger trivy vs task trivy vs aws-cdk trivy vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is trivy or webhook more popular?

trivy has 37,961 GitHub stars and webhook has 12,134. trivy has the larger community by that measure.

Are trivy and webhook free?

Both are open source. trivy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and webhook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between trivy and webhook?

trivy is written in Go and webhook in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, trivy or webhook?

Choose trivy if you want the larger community (37,961 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose webhook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.