head to head · open source
aircrack-ng vs tradememory-protocol
aircrack-ng has 7,860 GitHub stars, 1,404 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. tradememory-protocol has 1,438 stars, 170 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. aircrack-ng leads on adoption by 447% (7,860 vs 1,438 stars). aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0; tradememory-protocol is written in Python under MIT. aircrack-ng has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, tradememory-protocol 12%. tradememory-protocol was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| aircrack-ng | tradememory-protocol | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.9K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | C | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 170 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick aircrack-ng if
- You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tradememory-protocol if
- You want the tradememory-protocol feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and tradememory-protocol fits your workflow better
About aircrack-ng
Aircrack ng Badges GitHub CI Others Repository versions Description Aircrack ng is a complete suite of tools to assess WiFi network security. It focuses on different areas of WiFi security: Monitoring: Packet capture and export of data to text files for further processing by third party tools. Attacking: Replay attacks, deauthentication, fake access points and others via packet injection. Testing: Checking WiFi cards and driver capabilities (capture and injection). Cracking: WEP and WPA PSK (WPA 1 and 2). All tools are command line which allows for heavy scripting. A lot of GUIs have taken advantage of this…
read the full aircrack-ng overview →
About tradememory-protocol
Getting Started Use Cases API Reference OWM Framework Limitations 中文版 Project status (August 2026): Feature complete, in maintenance mode — bug and security reports are still reviewed; no new features or hosted service are planned. For paid work, see Trading Record Analysis. Your trading AI has amnesia. And regulators are starting to notice. It makes the same mistakes every session. It can't explain why it traded. It forgets everything when the context window ends. Meanwhile, MiFID II is raising the bar for algorithmic decision documentation (Article 17). The EU AI Act demands systematic logging of AI actions…
read the full tradememory-protocol overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is aircrack-ng or tradememory-protocol more popular?
aircrack-ng has 7,860 GitHub stars and tradememory-protocol has 1,438. aircrack-ng has the larger community by that measure.
Are aircrack-ng and tradememory-protocol free?
Both are open source. aircrack-ng is licensed under GPL-2.0 and tradememory-protocol under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between aircrack-ng and tradememory-protocol?
aircrack-ng is written in C and tradememory-protocol in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, aircrack-ng or tradememory-protocol?
Choose aircrack-ng if you want the larger community (7,860 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose tradememory-protocol if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.