head to head · open source

TiDB vs Dragonfly

TiDB has 40,542 GitHub stars, 6,242 forks, 6,976 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Dragonfly has 31,579 stars, 1,264 forks, 308 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. TiDB leads on adoption by 28% (40,542 vs 31,579 stars). TiDB is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Dragonfly is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence. TiDB has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Dragonfly 4%. TiDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

TiDB ★ 41K Dragonfly ★ 32K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

TiDB Dragonfly
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 32K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Go C++
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick TiDB if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full TiDB profile →

pick Dragonfly if

  • You want the Dragonfly feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Dragonfly fits your workflow better

full Dragonfly profile →

About TiDB

TiDB is an open source, cloud native, distributed SQL database written in Go and licensed under Apache 2.0, aimed at teams that need ACID transactions, real time analytics, and vector search at scale without data silos.

read the full TiDB overview →

About Dragonfly

Dragonfly is a C++ in memory data store that speaks the Redis and Memcached APIs, built for teams that want more throughput and lower resource use from an existing cache or key value workload without changing application code.

read the full Dragonfly overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

TiDB vs mall TiDB vs Prometheus TiDB vs NocoDB TiDB vs etcd TiDB vs DBeaver TiDB vs orm TiDB vs Milvus TiDB vs drawDB TiDB vs typeorm TiDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager TiDB vs Qdrant TiDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is TiDB or Dragonfly more popular?

TiDB has 40,542 GitHub stars and Dragonfly has 31,579. TiDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are TiDB and Dragonfly free?

Both are open source. TiDB is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Dragonfly has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between TiDB and Dragonfly?

TiDB is written in Go and Dragonfly in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, TiDB or Dragonfly?

Choose TiDB if you want the larger community (40,542 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Dragonfly if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.