head to head · open source
superpowers-zh vs apexyard
superpowers-zh has 8,481 GitHub stars, 786 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. apexyard has 542 stars, 328 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped yesterday. superpowers-zh leads on adoption by 1,465% (8,481 vs 542 stars). superpowers-zh is written in JavaScript under MIT; apexyard is written in Shell under MIT. superpowers-zh has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, apexyard 61%. apexyard was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (agentic-coding, claude-code, code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| superpowers-zh | apexyard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.5K | ★ 542 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Shell |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-11-05 |
| Forks | ⑂ 786 | ⑂ 328 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick superpowers-zh if
- You weight community size — 8.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick apexyard if
- You want the apexyard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You evaluated both and apexyard fits your workflow better
About superpowers-zh
superpowers zh(AI 编程超能力 · 中文增强版) 🌐 简体中文 繁體中文 English (upstream) 🦸 superpowers(250k+ ⭐)完整汉化 + 4 个中国原创 skills — 让 Claude Code / Copilot CLI / Hermes Agent / Cursor / Windsurf / Kiro / Gemini CLI / Qoder 等 26 款 AI 编程工具 真正会干活。从头脑风暴到代码审查,从 TDD 到调试,每个 skill 都是经过实战验证的工作方法论。 Chinese community edition of superpowers — 20 skills across 26 AI coding tools, including full translations and China specific development skills. 📖 免费配套学习 → 从零学会 AI 编程(182 节)+ 从零构建 AI 智能体(40 节):两门免费实操课 + 实战社区,superpowers 装好后配上方法论效率翻倍(站上共 13 门课、648 节, 全部 ¥0 ——另有 AI 绘画 / 写小说 / 漫剧 / 量化 / DeepSeek / 深度专注 等) 🌍 Also available in English · 日本語 ·…
read the full superpowers-zh overview →
About apexyard
ApexYard Take agent built code the last mile — safely to production. AI can build quickly. Shipping safely needs a system. AI can produce a working prototype in a weekend. Teams still need a way to track decisions, review changes, run checks, and approve a release. ApexYard provides that system. Every change starts with a ticket. An independent reviewer checks the change. A merge gate stays closed until a named human approves the exact commit. ApexYard is a multi project ops repo . You fork it, register your projects, and manage the portfolio from one place. Shared rules, project records, and shell hooks keep…
read the full apexyard overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is superpowers-zh or apexyard more popular?
superpowers-zh has 8,481 GitHub stars and apexyard has 542. superpowers-zh has the larger community by that measure.
Are superpowers-zh and apexyard free?
Both are open source. superpowers-zh is licensed under MIT and apexyard under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between superpowers-zh and apexyard?
superpowers-zh is written in JavaScript and apexyard in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, superpowers-zh or apexyard?
Choose superpowers-zh if you want the larger community (8,481 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose apexyard if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.