head to head · open source
rclone vs copyparty
rclone has 60,740 GitHub stars, 5,640 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty has 47,235 stars, 1,918 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. rclone leads on adoption by 29% (60,740 vs 47,235 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; copyparty is written in Python under MIT. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, copyparty 4%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| rclone | copyparty | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 61K | ★ 47K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.6K | ⑂ 1.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick rclone if
- You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick copyparty if
- You want the copyparty feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and copyparty fits your workflow better
About rclone
Website Documentation Download Contributing Changelog Installation Forum Rclone Rclone ("rsync for cloud storage") is a command line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Storage providers 1Fichier :page facing up: Akamai Netstorage :page facing up: Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Object Storage System (OSS) :page facing up: Amazon S3 :page facing up: ArvanCloud Object Storage (AOS) :page facing up: Bizfly Cloud Simple Storage :page facing up: Backblaze B2 :page facing up: Box :page facing up: Ceph :page facing up: China Mobile Ecloud Elastic Object Storage (EOS) :page…
read the full rclone overview →
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is rclone or copyparty more popular?
rclone has 60,740 GitHub stars and copyparty has 47,235. rclone has the larger community by that measure.
Are rclone and copyparty free?
Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and copyparty under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between rclone and copyparty?
rclone is written in Go and copyparty in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, rclone or copyparty?
Choose rclone if you want the larger community (60,740 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose copyparty if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.