head to head · open source

streama vs xiu

streama has 9,820 GitHub stars, 978 forks, 352 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. xiu has 2,331 stars, 239 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. streama leads on adoption by 321% (9,820 vs 2,331 stars). streama is written in JavaScript under MIT; xiu is written in Rust under MIT. streama has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, xiu 10%. streama was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

streama ★ 9.8K xiu ★ 2.3K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

streama xiu
GitHub stars ★ 9.8K ★ 2.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-08-09 2026-03-07
Forks ⑂ 978 ⑂ 239
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick streama if

  • You weight community size — 9.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full streama profile →

pick xiu if

  • You want the xiu feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and xiu fits your workflow better

full xiu profile →

About streama

Streama is a self hosted streaming media server, written in JavaScript and released under the MIT licence, that gives someone with a large personal collection of films and shows a private Netflix style library they run and control themselves.

read the full streama overview →

About xiu

Xiu is an open source live media server written in pure Rust under the MIT license. It supports RTMP, RTSP, WebRTC through Whip and Whep, HTTP FLV, and HLS, and it runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows. It belongs to the Rust media server ecosystem and targets live audio and video distribution.

read the full xiu overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

mediamtx vs streama go2rtc vs streama mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs cloudflare-imgbed mediamtx vs node-media-server mediamtx vs lychee mediamtx vs seanime next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

streama vs mediamtx streama vs go2rtc streama vs tubearchivist streama vs CloudFlare-ImgBed streama vs Node-Media-Server streama vs Lychee streama vs seanime streama vs Piwigo streama vs nginx-http-flv-module streama vs foss_photo_libraries streama vs tubesync streama vs UniversalMediaServer

Frequently asked questions

Is streama or xiu more popular?

streama has 9,820 GitHub stars and xiu has 2,331. streama has the larger community by that measure.

Are streama and xiu free?

Both are open source. streama is licensed under MIT and xiu under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between streama and xiu?

streama is written in JavaScript and xiu in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, streama or xiu?

Choose streama if you want the larger community (9,820 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xiu if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.