head to head · open source

streama vs Openinary

streama has 9,820 GitHub stars, 978 forks, 352 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Openinary has 403 stars, 55 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. streama leads on adoption by 2,337% (9,820 vs 403 stars). streama is written in JavaScript under MIT; Openinary is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. streama has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Openinary 14%. Openinary was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

streama ★ 9.8K Openinary ★ 403 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

streama Openinary
GitHub stars ★ 9.8K ★ 403
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-09 2026-08-28
Forks ⑂ 978 ⑂ 55
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick streama if

  • You weight community size — 9.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full streama profile →

pick Openinary if

  • You want the Openinary feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Openinary fits your workflow better

full Openinary profile →

About streama

Streama is a self hosted streaming media server, written in JavaScript and released under the MIT licence, that gives someone with a large personal collection of films and shows a private Netflix style library they run and control themselves.

read the full streama overview →

About Openinary

Openinary is an open source, self hostable media processing platform that delivers images and videos through URL based transformations, built for developers and platform teams who want Cloudinary style media delivery without depending on a proprietary SaaS provider.

read the full Openinary overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

mediamtx vs streama go2rtc vs streama mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs cloudflare-imgbed mediamtx vs node-media-server mediamtx vs lychee mediamtx vs seanime next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

streama vs mediamtx streama vs go2rtc streama vs tubearchivist streama vs CloudFlare-ImgBed streama vs Node-Media-Server streama vs Lychee streama vs seanime streama vs Piwigo streama vs nginx-http-flv-module streama vs foss_photo_libraries streama vs tubesync streama vs UniversalMediaServer

Frequently asked questions

Is streama or Openinary more popular?

streama has 9,820 GitHub stars and Openinary has 403. streama has the larger community by that measure.

Are streama and Openinary free?

Both are open source. streama is licensed under MIT and Openinary under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between streama and Openinary?

streama is written in JavaScript and Openinary in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, streama or Openinary?

Choose streama if you want the larger community (9,820 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Openinary if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.