head to head · open source
shynet vs tianji
shynet has 3,157 GitHub stars, 212 forks, 63 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. tianji has 3,118 stars, 199 forks, 139 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. shynet leads on adoption by 1% (3,157 vs 3,118 stars). shynet is written in Python under Apache-2.0; tianji is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. shynet has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, tianji 6%. tianji was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (analytics, docker, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| shynet | tianji | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.2K | ★ 3.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-03-15 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 212 | ⑂ 199 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick shynet if
- You weight community size — 3.2K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tianji if
- You want the tianji feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and tianji fits your workflow better
About shynet
Modern, privacy friendly, and cookie free web analytics. Getting started » Screenshots • Features • Office Hours Motivation There are a lot of web analytics tools. Unfortunately, most of them come with the following caveats: They require handing all of your visitors' info to a third party company They use cookies to track visitors across sessions, so you need to have those annoying cookie notices They collect so much personal data that even the NSA is jealous They are closed source and/or expensive, often with limited data portability They are hard to use Shynet has none of these caveats. You host it…
read the full shynet overview →
About tianji
Tianji All in One Insight Hub Website analytics + Uptime Monitor + Server Status = Tianji All in one project! Motivation During our observations of the website. We often need to use multiple applications together. For example, we need analysis tools such as GA / umami to check pv/uv and the number of visits to each page, we need an uptime monitor to check the network quality and connectivity of the server, and we need to use prometheus to obtain the status reported by the server to check the quality of the server. In addition, if we develop an application that allows open source deployment, we often need a…
read the full tianji overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is shynet or tianji more popular?
shynet has 3,157 GitHub stars and tianji has 3,118. shynet has the larger community by that measure.
Are shynet and tianji free?
Both are open source. shynet is licensed under Apache-2.0 and tianji under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between shynet and tianji?
shynet is written in Python and tianji in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, shynet or tianji?
Choose shynet if you want the larger community (3,157 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose tianji if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.