head to head · open source
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs shynet
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars, 464 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. shynet has 3,157 stars, 212 forks, 63 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor leads on adoption by 178% (8,789 vs 3,157 stars). Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT; shynet is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, shynet 7%. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (analytics, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor | shynet | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.8K | ★ 3.2K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-07-05 | 2026-03-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 464 | ⑂ 212 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if
- You weight community size — 8.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick shynet if
- You want the shynet feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and shynet fits your workflow better
About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
🎯 Claude Code Usage Monitor A privacy first Claude Usage Ops companion for Claude Code. It combines a Rich live terminal monitor with official statusline rate limits , machine readable state/export output, provenance labels, forecasting, and an opt in local usage warehouse. 📑 Table of Contents ✨ Key Features 🚀 Installation ⚡ Modern Installation with uv (Recommended) 📦 Installation with pip 🛠️ Other Package Managers 📖 Usage Get Help Basic Usage Configuration Options Available Plans 🙏 Please Help Test This Release! ✨ Features & How It Works Current Features Understanding Claude Sessions Token Limits by Plan…
read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →
About shynet
Modern, privacy friendly, and cookie free web analytics. Getting started » Screenshots • Features • Office Hours Motivation There are a lot of web analytics tools. Unfortunately, most of them come with the following caveats: They require handing all of your visitors' info to a third party company They use cookies to track visitors across sessions, so you need to have those annoying cookie notices They collect so much personal data that even the NSA is jealous They are closed source and/or expensive, often with limited data portability They are hard to use Shynet has none of these caveats. You host it…
read the full shynet overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or shynet more popular?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars and shynet has 3,157. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and shynet free?
Both are open source. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT and shynet under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and shynet?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python and shynet in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or shynet?
Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if you want the larger community (8,789 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose shynet if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.