head to head · open source
shynet vs Aptabase
shynet has 3,157 GitHub stars, 212 forks, 63 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Aptabase has 1,865 stars, 141 forks, 59 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. shynet leads on adoption by 69% (3,157 vs 1,865 stars). shynet is written in Python under Apache-2.0; Aptabase is written in C# under AGPL-3.0. shynet has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Aptabase 8%. Aptabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (analytics, privacy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| shynet | Aptabase | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.2K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | C# |
| Last push | 2026-03-15 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 212 | ⑂ 141 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick shynet if
- You weight community size — 3.2K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Aptabase if
- You want the Aptabase feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and Aptabase fits your workflow better
About shynet
Modern, privacy friendly, and cookie free web analytics. Getting started » Screenshots • Features • Office Hours Motivation There are a lot of web analytics tools. Unfortunately, most of them come with the following caveats: They require handing all of your visitors' info to a third party company They use cookies to track visitors across sessions, so you need to have those annoying cookie notices They collect so much personal data that even the NSA is jealous They are closed source and/or expensive, often with limited data portability They are hard to use Shynet has none of these caveats. You host it…
read the full shynet overview →
About Aptabase
Aptabase Analytics for Apps. Open Source. Privacy First. Simple. Learn more » About the Project Aptabase is an open source alternative to Firebase/Google Analytics, specifically built for Mobile, Desktop and Web apps. 📱 Extensive list of SDK : No matter what framework or language you use, we have an SDK for you. Swift, React Native, Flutter, Electron, Kotlin, and many others. 😇 Privacy First : We prioritize user privacy and collect minimal usage data without using unique identifiers. Instead, we focus on monitoring sessions, complying fully with GDPR, CCPA, and PECR regulations. 🚀 Simple : Built in and user…
read the full Aptabase overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is shynet or Aptabase more popular?
shynet has 3,157 GitHub stars and Aptabase has 1,865. shynet has the larger community by that measure.
Are shynet and Aptabase free?
Both are open source. shynet is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Aptabase under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between shynet and Aptabase?
shynet is written in Python and Aptabase in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, shynet or Aptabase?
Choose shynet if you want the larger community (3,157 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Aptabase if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.