head to head · open source

Umami vs Matomo

Umami has 38,885 GitHub stars, 8,053 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Matomo has 21,880 stars, 2,896 forks, 2,578 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Umami leads on adoption by 78% (38,885 vs 21,880 stars). Umami is written in TypeScript under MIT; Matomo is written in PHP under GPL-3.0. Umami has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, Matomo 13%. Matomo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Umami ★ 39K Matomo ★ 22K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Umami Matomo
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 22K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.1K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Umami if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Umami profile →

pick Matomo if

  • You want the Matomo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and Matomo fits your workflow better

full Matomo profile →

About Umami

Umami is a privacy first, open source web and product analytics platform that gives site owners and product teams traffic, campaign, behavior, conversion and revenue reporting without cookies or surveillance, run either self hosted or in the cloud.

read the full Umami overview →

About Matomo

Matomo is an open source digital analytics platform for websites and apps, formerly known as Piwik. It lives in the PHP and MySQL web analytics ecosystem, and the provided description positions it as an open alternative to Google Analytics and Amplitude. The project lets an organization collect, visualise, and analyse visitor data from its own digital properties.

read the full Matomo overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

posthog vs umami umami vs plausible posthog vs matomo umami vs rybbit plausible vs matomo posthog vs plausible posthog vs rybbit crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Umami vs PostHog Umami vs Plausible Umami vs Rybbit Umami vs Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Umami vs Fathom Lite Umami vs firebase-ios-sdk Umami vs Countly Umami vs shynet Umami vs tianji Umami vs OpenWebAnalytics Umami vs talivia Umami vs Aptabase

Frequently asked questions

Is Umami or Matomo more popular?

Umami has 38,885 GitHub stars and Matomo has 21,880. Umami has the larger community by that measure.

Are Umami and Matomo free?

Both are open source. Umami is licensed under MIT and Matomo under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Umami and Matomo?

Umami is written in TypeScript and Matomo in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Umami or Matomo?

Choose Umami if you want the larger community (38,885 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Matomo if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.