head to head · open source
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Fathom Lite
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars, 464 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Fathom Lite has 8,034 stars, 388 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor leads on adoption by 9% (8,789 vs 8,034 stars). Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT; Fathom Lite is written in Go under MIT. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Fathom Lite 5%. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor | Fathom Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.8K | ★ 8.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-07-05 | 2026-03-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 464 | ⑂ 388 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if
- You weight community size — 8.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Fathom Lite if
- You want the Fathom Lite feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Fathom Lite fits your workflow better
About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
🎯 Claude Code Usage Monitor A privacy first Claude Usage Ops companion for Claude Code. It combines a Rich live terminal monitor with official statusline rate limits , machine readable state/export output, provenance labels, forecasting, and an opt in local usage warehouse. 📑 Table of Contents ✨ Key Features 🚀 Installation ⚡ Modern Installation with uv (Recommended) 📦 Installation with pip 🛠️ Other Package Managers 📖 Usage Get Help Basic Usage Configuration Options Available Plans 🙏 Please Help Test This Release! ✨ Features & How It Works Current Features Understanding Claude Sessions Token Limits by Plan…
read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →
About Fathom Lite
Fathom Lite simple website analytics ============================== Fathom Lite is a previous and open source version of Fathom Analytics (a paid, hosted Google Analytics alternative). It was the very first version of our software, and has been downloaded millions of times! While we are no longer adding features to this Lite version, we will be continuing to maintain it long term and fix any bugs that come up. Fathom Lite vs Fathom (hosted) Today’s Fathom Analytics is a hosted product with simple pricing based on monthly pageviews. The same core capabilities are included on every plan: for example API access, up…
read the full Fathom Lite overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Fathom Lite more popular?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars and Fathom Lite has 8,034. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Fathom Lite free?
Both are open source. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT and Fathom Lite under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Fathom Lite?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python and Fathom Lite in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Fathom Lite?
Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if you want the larger community (8,789 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Fathom Lite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.