head to head · open source

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Fathom Lite

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,712 GitHub stars, 460 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Fathom Lite has 8,020 stars, 383 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor leads on adoption by 9% (8,712 vs 8,020 stars). Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT; Fathom Lite is written in Go under MIT. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Fathom Lite 5%. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor ★ 8.7K Fathom Lite ★ 8.0K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Fathom Lite
GitHub stars ★ 8.7K ★ 8.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-07-05 2026-03-18
Forks ⑂ 460 ⑂ 383
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if

  • You weight community size — 8.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor profile →

pick Fathom Lite if

  • You want the Fathom Lite feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Fathom Lite fits your workflow better

full Fathom Lite profile →

About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor

Claude Code Usage Monitor is a privacy first terminal and machine readable usage monitor for people who run Claude Code and need to track token, message, and cost consumption against plan limits. It lives in the Claude Code tooling ecosystem and replaces guesswork about how much of a 5 hour session or weekly allowance remains.

read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →

About Fathom Lite

Fathom Lite is the original open source, self hosted edition of Fathom Analytics — a simple, privacy focused website analytics tool written in Go with a Preact dashboard, released under the MIT licence for people who want to run their own analytics server rather than buy a hosted service.

read the full Fathom Lite overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

grafana vs posthog sentry vs posthog posthog vs umami posthog vs plausible umami vs plausible posthog vs matomo umami vs matomo posthog vs rybbit firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs PostHog Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Umami Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Plausible Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Matomo Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Rybbit Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs firebase-ios-sdk Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Countly Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs shynet Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs tianji Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs OpenWebAnalytics Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs talivia Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Aptabase

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Fathom Lite more popular?

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,712 GitHub stars and Fathom Lite has 8,020. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Fathom Lite free?

Both are open source. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT and Fathom Lite under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Fathom Lite?

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python and Fathom Lite in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Fathom Lite?

Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if you want the larger community (8,712 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Fathom Lite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.