head to head · open source
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Aptabase
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars, 464 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Aptabase has 1,865 stars, 141 forks, 59 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor leads on adoption by 371% (8,789 vs 1,865 stars). Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT; Aptabase is written in C# under AGPL-3.0. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Aptabase 8%. Aptabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor | Aptabase | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.8K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | C# |
| Last push | 2026-07-05 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 464 | ⑂ 141 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if
- You weight community size — 8.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Aptabase if
- You want the Aptabase feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and Aptabase fits your workflow better
About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
🎯 Claude Code Usage Monitor A privacy first Claude Usage Ops companion for Claude Code. It combines a Rich live terminal monitor with official statusline rate limits , machine readable state/export output, provenance labels, forecasting, and an opt in local usage warehouse. 📑 Table of Contents ✨ Key Features 🚀 Installation ⚡ Modern Installation with uv (Recommended) 📦 Installation with pip 🛠️ Other Package Managers 📖 Usage Get Help Basic Usage Configuration Options Available Plans 🙏 Please Help Test This Release! ✨ Features & How It Works Current Features Understanding Claude Sessions Token Limits by Plan…
read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →
About Aptabase
Aptabase Analytics for Apps. Open Source. Privacy First. Simple. Learn more » About the Project Aptabase is an open source alternative to Firebase/Google Analytics, specifically built for Mobile, Desktop and Web apps. 📱 Extensive list of SDK : No matter what framework or language you use, we have an SDK for you. Swift, React Native, Flutter, Electron, Kotlin, and many others. 😇 Privacy First : We prioritize user privacy and collect minimal usage data without using unique identifiers. Instead, we focus on monitoring sessions, complying fully with GDPR, CCPA, and PECR regulations. 🚀 Simple : Built in and user…
read the full Aptabase overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Aptabase more popular?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars and Aptabase has 1,865. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Aptabase free?
Both are open source. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT and Aptabase under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Aptabase?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python and Aptabase in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Aptabase?
Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if you want the larger community (8,789 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Aptabase if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.