head to head · open source

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Countly

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,712 GitHub stars, 460 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Countly has 5,905 stars, 981 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor leads on adoption by 48% (8,712 vs 5,905 stars). Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT; Countly is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Countly 17%. Countly was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor ★ 8.7K Countly ★ 5.9K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Countly
GitHub stars ★ 8.7K ★ 5.9K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-07-05 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 460 ⑂ 981
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if

  • You weight community size — 8.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor profile →

pick Countly if

  • You want the Countly feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Countly fits your workflow better

full Countly profile →

About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor

Claude Code Usage Monitor is a privacy first terminal and machine readable usage monitor for people who run Claude Code and need to track token, message, and cost consumption against plan limits. It lives in the Claude Code tooling ecosystem and replaces guesswork about how much of a 5 hour session or weekly allowance remains.

read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →

About Countly

Countly is a privacy first, AI ready analytics and customer engagement platform that organizations deploy themselves rather than consume only as a hosted service. The server side component lives in this repository and is written in JavaScript, sitting in the JavaScript and Node.js ecosystem alongside the client SDKs that ship separately for iOS, Android, React Native, Flutter, NodeJS, Unity, Java and JavaScript. The platform is built around the idea that customer data should stay under the operator's control: Countly runs on premises or in a private cloud, and the project describes full data ownership, deployment…

read the full Countly overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

grafana vs posthog sentry vs posthog posthog vs umami posthog vs plausible umami vs plausible posthog vs matomo umami vs matomo posthog vs rybbit firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs PostHog Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Umami Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Plausible Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Matomo Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Rybbit Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Fathom Lite Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs firebase-ios-sdk Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs shynet Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs tianji Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs OpenWebAnalytics Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs talivia Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Aptabase

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Countly more popular?

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,712 GitHub stars and Countly has 5,905. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Countly free?

Both are open source. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT, and Countly has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Countly?

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python and Countly in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Countly?

Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if you want the larger community (8,712 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Countly if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.