head to head · open source

Sentry vs Statusnook

Sentry has 44,806 GitHub stars, 4,857 forks, 2,265 open issues and last shipped today. Statusnook has 983 stars, 31 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 1.9 years ago. Sentry leads on adoption by 4,458% (44,806 vs 983 stars). Sentry is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; Statusnook is written in Go under MIT. Sentry has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Statusnook 3%. Sentry was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Sentry ★ 45K Statusnook ★ 983 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Sentry Statusnook
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 983
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2024-10-31
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Sentry if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Sentry profile →

pick Statusnook if

  • You want the Statusnook feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Statusnook fits your workflow better

full Statusnook profile →

About Sentry

Sentry is an open source debugging platform for detecting, tracing, and fixing software issues in real time. It lives in the developer infrastructure ecosystem and provides error tracking and performance monitoring across languages, frameworks, and runtime environments.

read the full Sentry overview →

About Statusnook

Statusnook is a self hosted, MIT licensed status page and endpoint monitoring tool written in Go, aimed at small teams and individual operators who want to publish service health on their own infrastructure rather than pay for a hosted status page.

read the full Statusnook overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Sentry vs Uptime Kuma Sentry vs worldmonitor Sentry vs NetData Sentry vs Grafana Sentry vs huginn Sentry vs SigNoz Sentry vs Grafana Loki Sentry vs beszel Sentry vs cilium Sentry vs Apache SkyWalking Sentry vs jaeger Sentry vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Sentry or Statusnook more popular?

Sentry has 44,806 GitHub stars and Statusnook has 983. Sentry has the larger community by that measure.

Are Sentry and Statusnook free?

Both are open source. Sentry has no licence declared in this registry, and Statusnook is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Sentry and Statusnook?

Sentry is written in Python and Statusnook in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Sentry or Statusnook?

Choose Sentry if you want the larger community (44,806 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Statusnook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.