head to head · open source

Sentry vs kapacitor

Sentry has 44,806 GitHub stars, 4,857 forks, 2,265 open issues and last shipped today. kapacitor has 2,377 stars, 479 forks, 834 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Sentry leads on adoption by 1,785% (44,806 vs 2,377 stars). Sentry is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; kapacitor is written in Go under MIT. Sentry has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, kapacitor 20%. Sentry was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Sentry ★ 45K kapacitor ★ 2.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Sentry kapacitor
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 2.4K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 479
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Sentry if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Sentry profile →

pick kapacitor if

  • You want the kapacitor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and kapacitor fits your workflow better

full kapacitor profile →

About Sentry

Sentry is an open source debugging platform for detecting, tracing, and fixing software issues in real time. It lives in the developer infrastructure ecosystem and provides error tracking and performance monitoring across languages, frameworks, and runtime environments.

read the full Sentry overview →

About kapacitor

Kapacitor is an open source, MIT licensed framework written in Go for processing, monitoring, and alerting on time series data, built for operators and platform engineers who store metrics in InfluxDB and need rule based stream and batch processing on top of them.

read the full kapacitor overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Sentry vs Uptime Kuma Sentry vs worldmonitor Sentry vs NetData Sentry vs Grafana Sentry vs huginn Sentry vs SigNoz Sentry vs Grafana Loki Sentry vs beszel Sentry vs cilium Sentry vs Apache SkyWalking Sentry vs jaeger Sentry vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Sentry or kapacitor more popular?

Sentry has 44,806 GitHub stars and kapacitor has 2,377. Sentry has the larger community by that measure.

Are Sentry and kapacitor free?

Both are open source. Sentry has no licence declared in this registry, and kapacitor is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Sentry and kapacitor?

Sentry is written in Python and kapacitor in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Sentry or kapacitor?

Choose Sentry if you want the larger community (44,806 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose kapacitor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.