head to head · open source

Sentry vs jmx_exporter

Sentry has 44,806 GitHub stars, 4,857 forks, 2,265 open issues and last shipped today. jmx_exporter has 3,329 stars, 1,226 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Sentry leads on adoption by 1,246% (44,806 vs 3,329 stars). Sentry is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; jmx_exporter is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Sentry has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, jmx_exporter 37%. Sentry was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Sentry ★ 45K jmx_exporter ★ 3.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Sentry jmx_exporter
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 3.3K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Sentry if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Sentry profile →

pick jmx_exporter if

  • You want the jmx_exporter feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and jmx_exporter fits your workflow better

full jmx_exporter profile →

About Sentry

Sentry is an open source debugging platform for detecting, tracing, and fixing software issues in real time. It lives in the developer infrastructure ecosystem and provides error tracking and performance monitoring across languages, frameworks, and runtime environments.

read the full Sentry overview →

About jmx_exporter

jmx exporter is a Java collector published under the Prometheus organisation that reads JMX MBean values and turns them into metrics Prometheus can consume, aimed at Java operators and Prometheus users who need visibility into JVM and application internals that are exposed only over JMX.

read the full jmx_exporter overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Sentry vs Uptime Kuma Sentry vs worldmonitor Sentry vs NetData Sentry vs Grafana Sentry vs huginn Sentry vs SigNoz Sentry vs Grafana Loki Sentry vs beszel Sentry vs cilium Sentry vs Apache SkyWalking Sentry vs jaeger Sentry vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Sentry or jmx_exporter more popular?

Sentry has 44,806 GitHub stars and jmx_exporter has 3,329. Sentry has the larger community by that measure.

Are Sentry and jmx_exporter free?

Both are open source. Sentry has no licence declared in this registry, and jmx_exporter is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Sentry and jmx_exporter?

Sentry is written in Python and jmx_exporter in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Sentry or jmx_exporter?

Choose Sentry if you want the larger community (44,806 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose jmx_exporter if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.