head to head · open source
Sentry vs AutoKuma
Sentry has 44,806 GitHub stars, 4,857 forks, 2,265 open issues and last shipped today. AutoKuma has 898 stars, 47 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Sentry leads on adoption by 4,890% (44,806 vs 898 stars). Sentry is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; AutoKuma is written in Rust under MIT. Sentry has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, AutoKuma 5%. Sentry was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (monitor, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Sentry | AutoKuma | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 898 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-06-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.9K | ⑂ 47 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Sentry if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick AutoKuma if
- You want the AutoKuma feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and AutoKuma fits your workflow better
About Sentry
Sentry is an open source debugging platform for detecting, tracing, and fixing software issues in real time. It lives in the developer infrastructure ecosystem and provides error tracking and performance monitoring across languages, frameworks, and runtime environments.
read the full Sentry overview →
About AutoKuma
AutoKuma is an MIT licensed Rust utility that creates Uptime Kuma monitors automatically from Docker container labels, .json / .toml files, or Kubernetes custom resources, made for self hosters and operators who run Uptime Kuma next to containerized services and do not want to add monitors one by one in the web UI.
read the full AutoKuma overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Sentry or AutoKuma more popular?
Sentry has 44,806 GitHub stars and AutoKuma has 898. Sentry has the larger community by that measure.
Are Sentry and AutoKuma free?
Both are open source. Sentry has no licence declared in this registry, and AutoKuma is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Sentry and AutoKuma?
Sentry is written in Python and AutoKuma in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Sentry or AutoKuma?
Choose Sentry if you want the larger community (44,806 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose AutoKuma if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.