head to head · open source
seaweedfs vs storage
seaweedfs has 36,027 GitHub stars, 3,112 forks, 772 open issues and last shipped yesterday. storage has 1,354 stars, 319 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped yesterday. seaweedfs leads on adoption by 2,561% (36,027 vs 1,354 stars). seaweedfs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; storage is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. seaweedfs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, storage 24%. seaweedfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| seaweedfs | storage | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 36K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-11 | 2026-11-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 319 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick seaweedfs if
- You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick storage if
- You want the storage feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and storage fits your workflow better
About seaweedfs
SeaweedFS SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system. There are two objectives: 1. to store billions of files! 2. to serve the files fast! One weed binary serves an S3 object store, a POSIX file system, and a lakehouse with S3 Tables, all over the same data. Each blob is one disk read away, capacity grows by starting another volume server, and cloud storage can be cached or tiered transparently. Both read and write operations have O(1) complexity and can run at the full speed supported by the underlying hardware. Download Binaries for different platforms Wiki Documentation Community…
read the full seaweedfs overview →
About storage
Supabase Storage Engine A scalable, lightweight object storage service. Read this post on why we decided to build a new object storage service. Multi protocol support (HTTP, TUS, S3, Iceberg) Uses Postgres as its datastore for storing metadata Authorization rules are written as Postgres Row Level Security policies Integrates with S3 Compatible Storages Extremely lightweight and performant Supported Protocols [x] HTTP/REST [x] TUS Resumable Upload [x] S3 Compatible API [x] Iceberg REST Catalog Documentation OpenAPI Spec Storage Guides Client library Development Copy .env.sample to .env file. Copy .env.test.sample…
read the full storage overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is seaweedfs or storage more popular?
seaweedfs has 36,027 GitHub stars and storage has 1,354. seaweedfs has the larger community by that measure.
Are seaweedfs and storage free?
Both are open source. seaweedfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and storage under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between seaweedfs and storage?
seaweedfs is written in Go and storage in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, seaweedfs or storage?
Choose seaweedfs if you want the larger community (36,027 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose storage if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.