head to head · open source

rclone vs walk

rclone has 59,978 GitHub stars, 5,447 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. walk has 3,641 stars, 107 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. rclone leads on adoption by 1,547% (59,978 vs 3,641 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; walk is written in Go under MIT. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, walk 3%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K walk ★ 3.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone walk
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 3.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-26 2026-01-06
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 107
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick walk if

  • You want the walk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and walk fits your workflow better

full walk profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About walk

Walk is an MIT licensed terminal file manager written in Go that replaces the familiar pairing of cd and ls with an interactive navigator, aimed at developers and other command line users who want to move through the filesystem with arrow keys or hjkl instead of typing paths.

read the full walk overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or walk more popular?

rclone has 59,978 GitHub stars and walk has 3,641. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and walk free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and walk under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and walk?

rclone is written in Go and walk in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or walk?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,978 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose walk if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.