head to head · open source

rclone vs Twake Drive

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars, 5,413 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Twake Drive has 984 stars, 164 forks, 128 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rclone leads on adoption by 5,982% (59,844 vs 984 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; Twake Drive is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Twake Drive 17%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K Twake Drive ★ 984 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone Twake Drive
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 984
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 164
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick Twake Drive if

  • You want the Twake Drive feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Twake Drive fits your workflow better

full Twake Drive profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About Twake Drive

Twake Drive is an AGPL 3.0, JavaScript file management application that runs on the Cozy stack and gives individuals and teams a self hosted alternative to Google Drive for storing, organising, and sharing files.

read the full Twake Drive overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or Twake Drive more popular?

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars and Twake Drive has 984. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and Twake Drive free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and Twake Drive under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and Twake Drive?

rclone is written in Go and Twake Drive in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or Twake Drive?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,844 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Twake Drive if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.