head to head · open source

rclone vs Sync-in

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars, 5,413 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Sync-in has 1,773 stars, 137 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rclone leads on adoption by 3,275% (59,844 vs 1,773 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; Sync-in is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Sync-in 8%. Sync-in was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dropbox), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K Sync-in ★ 1.8K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone Sync-in
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 1.8K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 137
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick Sync-in if

  • You want the Sync-in feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Sync-in fits your workflow better

full Sync-in profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About Sync-in

Sync in is a self hosted platform for file storage, synchronization, and team collaboration. It lives in the self hosted file management ecosystem, alongside homelab, on premise, and cloud alternative use cases. The project is written in TypeScript and licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Sync-in overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or Sync-in more popular?

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars and Sync-in has 1,773. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and Sync-in free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and Sync-in under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and Sync-in?

rclone is written in Go and Sync-in in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or Sync-in?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,844 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Sync-in if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.