head to head · open source

rclone vs rclone-manager

rclone has 59,926 GitHub stars, 5,424 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rclone-manager has 1,132 stars, 54 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rclone leads on adoption by 5,194% (59,926 vs 1,132 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; rclone-manager is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, rclone-manager 5%. rclone-manager was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dropbox), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K rclone-manager ★ 1.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone rclone-manager
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 1.1K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 54
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick rclone-manager if

  • You want the rclone-manager feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rclone-manager fits your workflow better

full rclone-manager profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About rclone-manager

RClone Manager is a cross platform, GPL 3.0 licensed graphical application for managing Rclone remotes, built for people who want the capabilities of the Rclone command line tool without working exclusively in a terminal.

read the full rclone-manager overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or rclone-manager more popular?

rclone has 59,926 GitHub stars and rclone-manager has 1,132. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and rclone-manager free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and rclone-manager under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and rclone-manager?

rclone is written in Go and rclone-manager in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or rclone-manager?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,926 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rclone-manager if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.