head to head · open source

rclone vs psitransfer

rclone has 60,027 GitHub stars, 5,461 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. psitransfer has 1,953 stars, 247 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. rclone leads on adoption by 2,974% (60,027 vs 1,953 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; psitransfer is written in JavaScript under BSD-2-Clause. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, psitransfer 13%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K psitransfer ★ 2.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone psitransfer
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 2.0K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-06-02
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 247
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick psitransfer if

  • You want the psitransfer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and psitransfer fits your workflow better

full psitransfer profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About psitransfer

PsiTransfer is a simple, open source, self hosted file sharing service written in JavaScript under the BSD 2 Clause licence, intended for individuals and teams that want to send large files without accounts, logins or a paid provider.

read the full psitransfer overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or psitransfer more popular?

rclone has 60,027 GitHub stars and psitransfer has 1,953. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and psitransfer free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and psitransfer under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and psitransfer?

rclone is written in Go and psitransfer in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or psitransfer?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (60,027 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose psitransfer if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.