head to head · open source

rclone vs psitransfer

rclone has 61,015 GitHub stars, 5,697 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. psitransfer has 1,975 stars, 248 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. rclone leads on adoption by 2,989% (61,015 vs 1,975 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; psitransfer is written in JavaScript under BSD-2-Clause. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, psitransfer 13%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 61K psitransfer ★ 2.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone psitransfer
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 2.0K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-14 2026-11-10
Forks ⑂ 5.7K ⑂ 248
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick psitransfer if

  • You want the psitransfer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and psitransfer fits your workflow better

full psitransfer profile →

About rclone

Website Documentation Download Contributing Changelog Installation Forum Rclone Rclone ("rsync for cloud storage") is a command line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Storage providers 1Fichier :page facing up: Akamai Netstorage :page facing up: Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) Object Storage System (OSS) :page facing up: Amazon S3 :page facing up: ArvanCloud Object Storage (AOS) :page facing up: Bizfly Cloud Simple Storage :page facing up: Backblaze B2 :page facing up: Box :page facing up: Ceph :page facing up: China Mobile Ecloud Elastic Object Storage (EOS) :page…

read the full rclone overview →

About psitransfer

PsiTransfer Simple open source self hosted file sharing solution. It's an alternative to paid services like Dropbox, WeTransfer. No accounts, no logins Mobile friendly responsive interface Supports many and very big files (Streams ftw) Resumable up and downloads (tus.io) Set an expire time for your upload bucket One time downloads Download all files as zip/tar.gz archive Modal style file preview Requires Node =7.4 or use harmony async await flag Password protected download list (AES) /admin Page lists bucket information, Screenshot ( disabled until you set adminPass config value ) Lightweight Vue based frontend…

read the full psitransfer overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or psitransfer more popular?

rclone has 61,015 GitHub stars and psitransfer has 1,975. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and psitransfer free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and psitransfer under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and psitransfer?

rclone is written in Go and psitransfer in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or psitransfer?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (61,015 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose psitransfer if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.