head to head · open source

rclone vs Hoodik

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars, 5,413 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Hoodik has 1,479 stars, 68 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. rclone leads on adoption by 3,946% (59,844 vs 1,479 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; Hoodik is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Hoodik 5%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K Hoodik ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone Hoodik
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 1.5K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 68
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick Hoodik if

  • You want the Hoodik feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Hoodik fits your workflow better

full Hoodik profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About Hoodik

Hoodik is a self hosted, end to end encrypted cloud storage server. It lives in the Rust and Vue ecosystem, using Actix web on the backend and Vue 3 on the frontend, and it is packaged as a Docker first service with SQLite or PostgreSQL and S3 compatible storage options.

read the full Hoodik overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or Hoodik more popular?

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars and Hoodik has 1,479. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and Hoodik free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT, and Hoodik has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between rclone and Hoodik?

rclone is written in Go and Hoodik in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or Hoodik?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,844 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Hoodik if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.