head to head · open source

rclone vs Firefiles

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars, 5,413 forks, 1,273 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Firefiles has 371 stars, 57 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. rclone leads on adoption by 16,030% (59,844 vs 371 stars). rclone is written in Go under MIT; Firefiles is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. rclone has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Firefiles 15%. rclone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cloud-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rclone ★ 60K Firefiles ★ 371 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rclone Firefiles
GitHub stars ★ 60K ★ 371
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2025-11-03
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 57
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rclone if

  • You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rclone profile →

pick Firefiles if

  • You want the Firefiles feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Firefiles fits your workflow better

full Firefiles profile →

About rclone

Rclone is an MIT licensed, Go based command line program that syncs files and directories to and from cloud storage providers, built for anyone who needs one tool for many backends instead of a separate client for every service.

read the full rclone overview →

About Firefiles

Firefiles is an open source, self hosted alternative to Dropbox: a TypeScript and Next.js web application that turns your own cloud storage buckets — such as AWS S3, Backblaze, or Firebase Cloud Storage — into a single browser based drive with a familiar file system interface, built for people who want Dropbox style file management while keeping their files in storage they already own.

read the full Firefiles overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

rclone vs LocalSend rclone vs copyparty rclone vs Files rclone vs yazi rclone vs Spacedrive rclone vs Nextcloud rclone vs uppy rclone vs cloudreve rclone vs superfile rclone vs ranger rclone vs Seafile rclone vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is rclone or Firefiles more popular?

rclone has 59,844 GitHub stars and Firefiles has 371. rclone has the larger community by that measure.

Are rclone and Firefiles free?

Both are open source. rclone is licensed under MIT and Firefiles under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rclone and Firefiles?

rclone is written in Go and Firefiles in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rclone or Firefiles?

Choose rclone if you want the larger community (59,844 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Firefiles if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.