head to head · open source

ranger vs vifm

ranger has 17,414 GitHub stars, 940 forks, 896 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. vifm has 3,279 stars, 146 forks, 146 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. ranger leads on adoption by 431% (17,414 vs 3,279 stars). ranger is written in Python under GPL-3.0; vifm is written in C under GPL-2.0. ranger has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, vifm 4%. ranger was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ranger ★ 17K vifm ★ 3.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ranger vifm
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 3.3K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Python C
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 940 ⑂ 146
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ranger if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ranger profile →

pick vifm if

  • You want the vifm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and vifm fits your workflow better

full vifm profile →

About ranger

Ranger is a console file manager with VI key bindings, written in Python and released under the GNU General Public License version 3, for terminal users who want to browse, preview, and manipulate files without leaving a Unix shell.

read the full ranger overview →

About vifm

Vifm is a curses based, Vim like file manager for the terminal that gives people who already use Vim complete keyboard control over their files without having to learn a new set of commands.

read the full vifm overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

ranger vs LocalSend ranger vs rclone ranger vs copyparty ranger vs Files ranger vs yazi ranger vs Spacedrive ranger vs Nextcloud ranger vs uppy ranger vs cloudreve ranger vs superfile ranger vs Seafile ranger vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is ranger or vifm more popular?

ranger has 17,414 GitHub stars and vifm has 3,279. ranger has the larger community by that measure.

Are ranger and vifm free?

Both are open source. ranger is licensed under GPL-3.0 and vifm under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ranger and vifm?

ranger is written in Python and vifm in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ranger or vifm?

Choose ranger if you want the larger community (17,414 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose vifm if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.