head to head · open source

ranger vs Seafile

ranger has 17,405 GitHub stars, 942 forks, 896 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Seafile has 15,257 stars, 1,677 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ranger leads on adoption by 14% (17,405 vs 15,257 stars). ranger is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Seafile is written in C under a custom or non-standard licence. ranger has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Seafile 11%. Seafile was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ranger ★ 17K Seafile ★ 15K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ranger Seafile
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 15K
License GPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Python C
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 942 ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ranger if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ranger profile →

pick Seafile if

  • You want the Seafile feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and Seafile fits your workflow better

full Seafile profile →

About ranger

Ranger is a console file manager with VI key bindings, written in Python and released under the GNU General Public License version 3, for terminal users who want to browse, preview, and manipulate files without leaving a Unix shell.

read the full ranger overview →

About Seafile

Seafile is an open source cloud storage system written in C and positioned as a self hosted alternative to Dropbox and Google Drive. It organizes files into libraries, each of which can be synced separately, encrypted with a user chosen password, and shared between users or groups. The project lives in the self hosted file sync and document management ecosystem, where it combines storage, collaboration, knowledge management, and metadata features.

read the full Seafile overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

ranger vs LocalSend ranger vs rclone ranger vs copyparty ranger vs Files ranger vs yazi ranger vs Spacedrive ranger vs Nextcloud ranger vs uppy ranger vs cloudreve ranger vs superfile ranger vs PairDrop ranger vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is ranger or Seafile more popular?

ranger has 17,405 GitHub stars and Seafile has 15,257. ranger has the larger community by that measure.

Are ranger and Seafile free?

Both are open source. ranger is licensed under GPL-3.0, and Seafile has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ranger and Seafile?

ranger is written in Python and Seafile in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ranger or Seafile?

Choose ranger if you want the larger community (17,405 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Seafile if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.