head to head · open source

ranger vs nging

ranger has 17,418 GitHub stars, 940 forks, 896 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. nging has 1,594 stars, 223 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. ranger leads on adoption by 993% (17,418 vs 1,594 stars). ranger is written in Python under GPL-3.0; nging is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. ranger has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, nging 14%. nging was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ranger ★ 17K nging ★ 1.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ranger nging
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 1.6K
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 940 ⑂ 223
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ranger if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ranger profile →

pick nging if

  • You want the nging feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and nging fits your workflow better

full nging profile →

About ranger

Ranger is a console file manager with VI key bindings, written in Python and released under the GNU General Public License version 3, for terminal users who want to browse, preview, and manipulate files without leaving a Unix shell.

read the full ranger overview →

About nging

Nging is a self hosted website server administration panel written in Go for sysadmins and self hosters who need to manage Caddy and Nginx sites, databases, scheduled tasks, and network tooling from one web interface across Windows, Linux, macOS, and ARM devices.

read the full nging overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 94K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

ranger vs LocalSend ranger vs rclone ranger vs copyparty ranger vs Files ranger vs yazi ranger vs Spacedrive ranger vs Nextcloud ranger vs uppy ranger vs cloudreve ranger vs superfile ranger vs Seafile ranger vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is ranger or nging more popular?

ranger has 17,418 GitHub stars and nging has 1,594. ranger has the larger community by that measure.

Are ranger and nging free?

Both are open source. ranger is licensed under GPL-3.0 and nging under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ranger and nging?

ranger is written in Python and nging in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ranger or nging?

Choose ranger if you want the larger community (17,418 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose nging if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.