head to head · open source

quasar vs web-ext

quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars, 3,672 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. web-ext has 3,138 stars, 386 forks, 223 open issues and last shipped yesterday. quasar leads on adoption by 767% (27,211 vs 3,138 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; web-ext is written in JavaScript under MPL-2.0. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, web-ext 12%. web-ext was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-extension, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

quasar ★ 27K web-ext ★ 3.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

quasar web-ext
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 3.1K
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 386
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick quasar if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full quasar profile →

pick web-ext if

  • You want the web-ext feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and web-ext fits your workflow better

full web-ext profile →

About quasar

Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.

read the full quasar overview →

About web-ext

web ext is a command line tool for building, running, and testing WebExtensions. It lives in the JavaScript and npm ecosystem, and it targets browser add ons that use the WebExtensions API. The project is licensed under MPL 2.0 and is distributed through npm, with an unofficial Homebrew formula maintained by the community. It provides one command line interface for common extension development tasks.

read the full web-ext overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

vscode vs monaco-editor browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp playwright vs chrome-devtools-mcp puppeteer vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird playwright vs obscura ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

quasar vs uBlock quasar vs Ladybird quasar vs chrome-devtools-mcp quasar vs monaco-editor quasar vs Zen Browser quasar vs servo quasar vs serenity quasar vs refined-github quasar vs slate quasar vs Avalonia quasar vs webtorrent quasar vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is quasar or web-ext more popular?

quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars and web-ext has 3,138. quasar has the larger community by that measure.

Are quasar and web-ext free?

Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and web-ext under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between quasar and web-ext?

quasar is written in JavaScript and web-ext in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, quasar or web-ext?

Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,211 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose web-ext if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.