head to head · open source
quasar vs random-user-agent
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars, 3,668 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. random-user-agent has 760 stars, 82 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 3,480% (27,207 vs 760 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; random-user-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, random-user-agent 11%. random-user-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | random-user-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 760 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 82 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick random-user-agent if
- You want the random-user-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and random-user-agent fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
About random-user-agent
Automatically replaces the User Agent with a randomized one Random User Agent is an open source MIT licensed browser extension that is designed to replace the original browser User Agent identifier (is a sort of "fingerprint") with a randomized (based on your preferences). 🔥 Features list Incredibly lightweight ( 150KiB archived) Available in the official stores ([Chrome][link chrome store], [Firefox][link ff store], [Edge][link edge store], [Opera][link opera store]) Can automatically change the User Agent after a specified period of time Change User Agent on browser startup Replaces the User Agent HTTP header…
read the full random-user-agent overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or random-user-agent more popular?
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars and random-user-agent has 760. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and random-user-agent free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and random-user-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and random-user-agent?
quasar is written in JavaScript and random-user-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or random-user-agent?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,207 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose random-user-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.