head to head · open source
quasar vs random-user-agent
quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars, 3,672 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. random-user-agent has 759 stars, 81 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 3,485% (27,211 vs 759 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; random-user-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, random-user-agent 11%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | random-user-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 759 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 81 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick random-user-agent if
- You want the random-user-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and random-user-agent fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.
read the full quasar overview →
About random-user-agent
Random User Agent is a free, MIT licensed TypeScript browser extension for Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Opera that automatically replaces the browser's User Agent identifier with a randomized one, intended for individuals who want a different fingerprint without configuring anything by hand.
read the full random-user-agent overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or random-user-agent more popular?
quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars and random-user-agent has 759. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and random-user-agent free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and random-user-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and random-user-agent?
quasar is written in JavaScript and random-user-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or random-user-agent?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,211 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose random-user-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.