head to head · open source

quasar vs NiceTab

quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars, 3,672 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. NiceTab has 755 stars, 85 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 3,504% (27,211 vs 755 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; NiceTab is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, NiceTab 11%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

quasar ★ 27K NiceTab ★ 755 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

quasar NiceTab
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 755
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 85
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick quasar if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full quasar profile →

pick NiceTab if

  • You want the NiceTab feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and NiceTab fits your workflow better

full NiceTab profile →

About quasar

Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.

read the full quasar overview →

About NiceTab

NiceTab is an open source (GPL 3.0), TypeScript browser extension for Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and other Chromium based browsers that turns scattered open tabs into a searchable, syncable library of saved tabs, tab groups, and categories — built for anyone who keeps too many tabs open and wants a free, transparent alternative to OneTab, Toby, SessionBuddy, N Tab, and KepTab.

read the full NiceTab overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

vscode vs monaco-editor browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp playwright vs chrome-devtools-mcp puppeteer vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird playwright vs obscura ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

quasar vs uBlock quasar vs Ladybird quasar vs chrome-devtools-mcp quasar vs monaco-editor quasar vs Zen Browser quasar vs servo quasar vs serenity quasar vs refined-github quasar vs slate quasar vs Avalonia quasar vs webtorrent quasar vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is quasar or NiceTab more popular?

quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars and NiceTab has 755. quasar has the larger community by that measure.

Are quasar and NiceTab free?

Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and NiceTab under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between quasar and NiceTab?

quasar is written in JavaScript and NiceTab in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, quasar or NiceTab?

Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,211 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose NiceTab if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.