head to head · open source
quasar vs MicrosoftRewardsWebsite
quasar has 27,202 GitHub stars, 3,668 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. MicrosoftRewardsWebsite has 675 stars, 23 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 3,930% (27,202 vs 675 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; MicrosoftRewardsWebsite is written in TypeScript under MIT. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, MicrosoftRewardsWebsite 3%. MicrosoftRewardsWebsite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | MicrosoftRewardsWebsite | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 675 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-05 | 2026-11-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 23 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick MicrosoftRewardsWebsite if
- You want the MicrosoftRewardsWebsite feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and MicrosoftRewardsWebsite fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
About MicrosoftRewardsWebsite
Search automatic rewards Get the most out of your Microsoft rewards account and earn points every day! If you like the extension, please give it a star on GitHub! Download Google Chrome Store Firefox Store Mobile app If you enjoy the extension, 5 star rating would mean a lot:) Donate Donations help me make tools like this for free in my spare time. Any amount helps! ❤️ Sponsor me on GitHub, or donate with PayPal or any credit card: Features 1. Open 10 random tabs in Bing and close them once they are loaded. 2. Automatically open tabs every day when the browser is opened (turned on by default). 3. Choose duration…
read the full MicrosoftRewardsWebsite overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or MicrosoftRewardsWebsite more popular?
quasar has 27,202 GitHub stars and MicrosoftRewardsWebsite has 675. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and MicrosoftRewardsWebsite free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and MicrosoftRewardsWebsite under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and MicrosoftRewardsWebsite?
quasar is written in JavaScript and MicrosoftRewardsWebsite in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or MicrosoftRewardsWebsite?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,202 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose MicrosoftRewardsWebsite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.