head to head · open source
quasar vs Library-Detector-for-Chrome
quasar has 27,204 GitHub stars, 3,665 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Library-Detector-for-Chrome has 680 stars, 114 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 3,901% (27,204 vs 680 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; Library-Detector-for-Chrome is written in JavaScript under MIT. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Library-Detector-for-Chrome 17%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-extension, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | Library-Detector-for-Chrome | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 680 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 114 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Library-Detector-for-Chrome if
- You want the Library-Detector-for-Chrome feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Library-Detector-for-Chrome fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
About Library-Detector-for-Chrome
Library Detector For Chrome =========================== The Library Detector extension discovers which JavaScript libraries are being utilized on webpages that you visit and displays their icons on the Chrome Menu. Currently supports: $mol view AmCharts AMP AmplifyJS Angular AngularJS ApexCharts Backbone base2 Bento boomerang.js Bootstrap Boq Brewser CamanJS Can Chart.js Chartist Closure Library ControlJS core js Create React App CreateJS D3 DC.js Dojo Drupal ECharts Ember.js Ext JS Ezoic Fabric.js FastClick FlexSlider FlotCharts Framer FuseJS FusionCharts Gatsby Glow Google Maps gRaphaël GreenSock JS…
read the full Library-Detector-for-Chrome overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or Library-Detector-for-Chrome more popular?
quasar has 27,204 GitHub stars and Library-Detector-for-Chrome has 680. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and Library-Detector-for-Chrome free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and Library-Detector-for-Chrome under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and Library-Detector-for-Chrome?
quasar is written in JavaScript and Library-Detector-for-Chrome in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or Library-Detector-for-Chrome?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,204 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Library-Detector-for-Chrome if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.