head to head · open source

quasar vs GhostText

quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars, 3,668 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. GhostText has 3,649 stars, 134 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. quasar leads on adoption by 646% (27,207 vs 3,649 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; GhostText is written in JavaScript under MIT. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, GhostText 4%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

quasar ★ 27K GhostText ★ 3.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

quasar GhostText
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 3.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-19 2026-05-13
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 134
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick quasar if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full quasar profile →

pick GhostText if

  • You want the GhostText feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and GhostText fits your workflow better

full GhostText profile →

About quasar

Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…

read the full quasar overview →

About GhostText

Use your text editor to write in your browser. Everything you type in the editor will be instantly updated in the browser (and vice versa). Visit the ghosttext.fregante.com for more details and troubleshooting. If you love GhostText, consider sponsoring or hiring the maintainer @fregante Installation 1. Install your browser extension: [link chrome]: 'Version published on Chrome Web Store' [link firefox]: 'Version published on Mozilla Add ons' [link safari]: 'Version published on the Mac App Store' [ ][link chrome] [ ][link chrome] also compatible with [ ][link chrome] [ ][link chrome] [ ][link firefox] [ ][link…

read the full GhostText overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Frequently asked questions

Is quasar or GhostText more popular?

quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars and GhostText has 3,649. quasar has the larger community by that measure.

Are quasar and GhostText free?

Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and GhostText under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between quasar and GhostText?

quasar is written in JavaScript and GhostText in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, quasar or GhostText?

Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,207 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose GhostText if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.