head to head · open source
quasar vs competitive-companion
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars, 3,668 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. competitive-companion has 1,340 stars, 220 forks, 90 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 1,930% (27,207 vs 1,340 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; competitive-companion is written in TypeScript under MIT. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, competitive-companion 16%. competitive-companion was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | competitive-companion | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 220 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick competitive-companion if
- You want the competitive-companion feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and competitive-companion fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
About competitive-companion
Competitive Companion [link cws]: [link amo]: [ ][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ ][link amo] [ ][link amo] [ ][link amo] A browser extension which parses competitive programming problems from various online judges (like AtCoder and Codeforces) and sends them to various tools (like CP Editor and CPH). Capable of parsing problems and contests and extracting data like the example testcases and the time and memory constraints. Install [ Chrome extension][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ Firefox add on][link amo] [ ][link amo] Tools that use Competitive Companion acmX AI Virtual Assistant Assistant.nvim AutoCp…
read the full competitive-companion overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or competitive-companion more popular?
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars and competitive-companion has 1,340. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and competitive-companion free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and competitive-companion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and competitive-companion?
quasar is written in JavaScript and competitive-companion in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or competitive-companion?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,207 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose competitive-companion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.