head to head · open source
quasar vs archiveweb.page
quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars, 3,672 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. archiveweb.page has 1,577 stars, 112 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 1,625% (27,211 vs 1,577 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; archiveweb.page is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, archiveweb.page 7%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | archiveweb.page | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 112 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick archiveweb.page if
- You want the archiveweb.page feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and archiveweb.page fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.
read the full quasar overview →
About archiveweb.page
ArchiveWeb.page is a JavaScript web archiving application that runs directly in the browser as a Chrome/Chromium extension or a standalone Electron app, built for anyone who needs to capture, store, and replay high fidelity web archives without a server side capture pipeline.
read the full archiveweb.page overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or archiveweb.page more popular?
quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars and archiveweb.page has 1,577. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and archiveweb.page free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and archiveweb.page under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and archiveweb.page?
quasar is written in JavaScript and archiveweb.page in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or archiveweb.page?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,211 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose archiveweb.page if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.