head to head · open source

Puter vs Tracecat

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars, 4,062 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Tracecat has 3,804 stars, 416 forks, 137 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Puter leads on adoption by 1,045% (43,557 vs 3,804 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Tracecat is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Tracecat 11%. Tracecat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K Tracecat ★ 3.8K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter Tracecat
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 3.8K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 416
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick Tracecat if

  • You want the Tracecat feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Tracecat fits your workflow better

full Tracecat profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About Tracecat

Tracecat is an open source security automation platform for teams and AI agents. It lives in the security operations and incident response ecosystem, combining agents, workflows, lookup tables, and case management in one Python application. The project is licensed under AGPL 3.0, with a separate paid Enterprise Edition directory and feature gates.

read the full Tracecat overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat puter vs vault puter vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade puter vs tirreno puter vs marble mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs vault mattermost vs unkey vault vs unkey

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Signal Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Zen Puter vs Cinny Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet Puter vs Wire Puter vs Peergos

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Tracecat more popular?

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars and Tracecat has 3,804. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and Tracecat free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tracecat under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Puter and Tracecat?

Puter is written in TypeScript and Tracecat in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or Tracecat?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,557 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Tracecat if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.