head to head · open source

Puter vs Peergos

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars, 4,062 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Peergos has 2,519 stars, 199 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Puter leads on adoption by 1,629% (43,557 vs 2,519 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Peergos is written in Java under AGPL-3.0. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Peergos 8%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K Peergos ★ 2.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter Peergos
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 2.5K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 199
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick Peergos if

  • You want the Peergos feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Peergos fits your workflow better

full Peergos profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About Peergos

Peergos is a peer to peer secure file storage system, social network, and application protocol built in Java under AGPL 3.0. It lives in the IPFS, IPLD, and libp2p ecosystem and supports a private web where users control their data, decide where it is stored, and determine who can see it. The project addresses centralized services that can track users, expose personal data, and observe relationships or file contents without cryptographic access control.

read the full Peergos overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault puter vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade puter vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat puter vs tirreno puter vs marble mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente mattermost vs vault mattermost vs unkey vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs tracecat

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Signal Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Zen Puter vs Cinny Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet Puter vs Wire Puter vs SAMA

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Peergos more popular?

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars and Peergos has 2,519. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and Peergos free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Peergos under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Puter and Peergos?

Puter is written in TypeScript and Peergos in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or Peergos?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,557 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Peergos if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.