head to head · open source

Prometheus vs juicefs

Prometheus has 66,106 GitHub stars, 10,840 forks, 890 open issues and last shipped yesterday. juicefs has 14,436 stars, 1,288 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Prometheus leads on adoption by 358% (66,106 vs 14,436 stars). Prometheus is written in Go under Apache-2.0; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Prometheus has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. Prometheus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Prometheus ★ 66K juicefs ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Prometheus juicefs
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Prometheus if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Prometheus profile →

pick juicefs if

  • You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better

full juicefs profile →

About Prometheus

Prometheus is an open source monitoring system and time series database, part of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation ecosystem. It collects metrics from configured targets at defined intervals, evaluates alerting rules, and visualizes results. Designed for reliability in dynamic environments, it operates without reliance on distributed storage, ensuring each server node functions independently.

read the full Prometheus overview →

About juicefs

JuiceFS is a Go based, Apache 2.0 distributed POSIX file system that stores file data in object storage and metadata in a database engine such as Redis, MySQL, SQLite, or TiKV, and it is aimed at cloud native infrastructure, big data, machine learning, and AI workloads.

read the full juicefs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs prometheus prometheus vs nocodb mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Prometheus vs mall Prometheus vs NocoDB Prometheus vs etcd Prometheus vs DBeaver Prometheus vs orm Prometheus vs Milvus Prometheus vs TiDB Prometheus vs drawDB Prometheus vs typeorm Prometheus vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager Prometheus vs Qdrant Prometheus vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is Prometheus or juicefs more popular?

Prometheus has 66,106 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,436. Prometheus has the larger community by that measure.

Are Prometheus and juicefs free?

Both are open source. Prometheus is licensed under Apache-2.0 and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Prometheus and juicefs?

Prometheus is written in Go and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Prometheus or juicefs?

Choose Prometheus if you want the larger community (66,106 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.